And how much steel! W. Without the need to fight in the Atlantic; to transport large amounts of troops, equipment, and supplies across the entire continent; and the necessity to defend against Allied bombing, Germany could have massively reduced its U-boat, locomotive, and anti-aircraft gun and ammunition production and converted at least part of these capacities into the production of more aircraft and equipment for land warfare. By the onset of the great depression, Americans no longer cared to talk or think about the great war; even veterans felt that way. In contrast, people in Eastern Front were ordered to die where they stood. Should we condemn the French Revolution? Therefore, US dealing with Japan definitely helped allies. WW2 Even with everything noted above, Germany and its European partners could have still won the war were it not for Germany's declaration of war on the United States on December 11, 1941. There were the puppet states of Slovakia and Slovenia, volunteers from across Europe including neutral Spain, but all this was matched against Great Britain, France, Poland, the Soviet Union, and notably the United States. 'We Would Have Lost': Did U.S. Lend-Lease Aid Tip The Balance In Soviet Fight Against Nazi Germany? Instead, the United States became the arsenal of democracy and Germany's defeat was all but assured. The reason why Churchill was doing this, is because he wanted USSR to be destroyed by Germany, or at least let them bleed each other out, as the common advocacy was in early years of war among British and US industrialists or Anglo-centrists. Across Northern France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and into Northern Germany, 21st Army Group advanced on a front about 75 miles wide. During the Spanish Civil War, which has been called a dress rehearsal for the Second World War, Germany's Luftwaffe perfected its strategy of using dive bombers and close-support attack aircraft. BBC - History - World Wars: World War Two: How the Allies Won The same applies to their contribution in forcing the Germans to leave most heavy artillery in the Reich as anti-aircraft weapons, preventing them from being used as anti-tank weapons in the East. The United States was never within striking distance of Germany and it should have been obvious that Japan couldn't mount an invasion of the American west coast. However, the real significance of Lend-Lease for the Soviet war effort was that it covered the "sensitive points" of Soviet production -- gasoline, explosives, aluminum, nonferrous metals, radio communications, and so on, says historian Boris Sokolov. The Joint Chiefs of Staff anticipated trouble with Churchill. Had Hitlers claims against Poland been negotiated peacefully, not only would he have succeeded in averting the outbreak of war with Poland and the Western Allies, but he would not have felt the need to sign the Hitler-Stalin Pact of August 1939 carving up eastern Europe between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. To this day, there is still a tendency among Germans to believe that they lost only because they were outnumbered, and to minimize or ignore the extent to which they were outfought. When we analyze these, a quick conclusion comes as described below: 1 US help in Lend Lease to USSR and Britainwas considerable. However when we look at the sizes of the fronts, we see that even at the end of the war by mobilizing even teenagers, Germany would have still been at half strength compared to Soviets even if they moved all their divisions from Western Front to Eastern Front: The count of aircraft, tanks and especially guns follow a similar pattern, and especially in the case of guns or artillery, the disparage is greater. Would the Allies have won WWII if the USA had never entered We all know how the war turned outwith an overwhelming Soviet-Western Allied victory over Nazi Germany ending with the destruction of Germany and the death by starvation of millions of its citizens. How America Saved the Day in World War One | Time On April 23, 1947, it was forced to make an emergency landing with 36 people on board near the village of Volochanka on the Taimyr Peninsula. This, in turn, would have delayed the Soviet invasion of Finland until 1940. Malyshev encouraged the use of stamped parts and a cast turret in order to cut corners, accepting a certain temporary reduction in quality in return for much greater output of tanks. During World War I not to mention wars in European wars through the ages Germany didn't really fight alone. I assume that since Overlord hasn't happened that most or at least many of the German troops garrisoning France are available to be redeployed to Munich, Budapest, or anywhere else the Germans care to send them. I already posted a similar thread about US involvement in WWI. In the case of WWII, considering the American aids which sustained the British war effort and the Soviet resistance without Americans, London and Moscow would have had to do well more and to pay a higher price to defeat Nazi Germany. 2 US taking on Japan and preventing them from attacking anyone else. The Allies alone could not possibly have defeated Germany. Would the Allies have won WWII without the USA? | History Forum In other words, Lend-Lease was stabilizing. The lessons from the First World War should have been enough for Hitler and the German high command, but the decision to invade the Soviet Union in June 1941 when the British were still undefeated was a colossal blunder. Instead, Hitler strong-armed Hocha to sign a decree authorizing the entry of German troops into his nation effectively ending Czech independence. Most Russians believe the Soviet military would have been able to win World War II without the efforts of the U.S. or its allies, a new poll finds. It was really the only time Nazi Germany had actually declared war on an enemy, and it needed not to have happened. 117,000The armies of the Central Powers mobilised 25 million soldiers and 3.5 million of them died.World War 1 casualties. Therefore they would still have to keep some forces there even if they could reduce them much more. Thus, Hitler could have achieved the last of his territorial objectives without war, with the exception of those pertaining to the Soviet Union. Geographic feasibility. But it would A major question, a major discussion topic. Given the way the events of the war played out, there was no other foreseeable outcome other than her defeat. Britain, and probably France as well, would have likely pressured the Poles to accept such a reasonable compromise proposal and informed them they would not support Poland militarily if Poland rejected it just as they told Czech leaders after Munich. There would have been effects life in britain and russia would have been less plesent and food less plentiful. WW2 The entry of the United States was the turning point of the war, because it made the eventual defeat of Germany possible. It had been foreseen in 1916 that if the United States went to war, the Allies military effort against Germany would be upheld by U.S. supplies and by enormous extensions of credit. Which still means the answer to the OP is yes, the Allies could win. In addition, there would have been constant shortages of transportation and fuel. This gave Poland the footing it needed to refuse all of Hitlers subsequent attempts to negotiate the return of this Polish occupied German city. British-built armour plate also had a much higher nickel content 3 per cent versus 1 per cent for Russian-made steel which reduced the risk of armour spalling (i.e. Strangely, Hitler did not appear interested in convening such a Four Power Peace Conference. The US had massively increased production of planes and had developed some of the best single engine fighters of the war. This is the first in a series of five articles providing critical analysis as to how Germany Might Have Won World War II. Japan would have to cross thousands of kilometers of central Asian steppes in which they would be having to face Soviet armored brigades, who would be at home in these unimpeded plain steppes these were what Soviet tanks were designed for anyway. It was really the only time Nazi Germany had actually declared war on an enemy, and it needed not to have happened. It is no exaggeration to say that America won the war abroad and the peace at home at the same time. Web1.7K views, 156 likes, 1 loves, 4 comments, 22 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from Dark Documentaries: Japan's Most Desperate WW2 Attempt to Destroy the US Air Forces At the same time, Italian dictator Benito Mussolini could have made demands for France and Britain to honor their promises to Italy for more Yugoslav territory in return for entering World War One on the side of the Allies. Kennedy says that most historians agree that American entry into World War I tipped the scales against Germany and that without the participation of the United States the Allies would have lost, defined as having to make a compromise peace with the Germans largely on German terms. Things werent going well for the. These territorial claims included the entire Istrian peninsula and northern Dalmatian coast and adjacent islands in the Adriatic Sea as well as a protectorate over Albania, all of which ended up being annexedfollowing the Axis invasion of Yugoslavia in April 1941. However, I have serious doubts that the Germans would have been able to win the war had the USA stay neutral. On the map below, the line I've drawn from Central Austria, up around Prague, down towards Budapest, and back to Trieste is about 700 miles. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Though, it is questionable how much of the soldiers from Germanys privileged classes would be shipped to Eastern Front in that case. WebIf the US continued to send supplies to the Allies, then the Allies probably win, nothing else appearing. The United States later declared war on German ally Austria-Hungary on December 7, 1917. Allies have won While the United States quickly transitioned to a wartime economy that had companies like IBM making rifles instead of typewriters and GM making tanks instead of cars; Germany was producing consumer goods all the way until 1942 when Albert Speer took over as Minister of Armaments. Overcoming massive defeats and colossal losses over the first 18 months of the war, the Red Army was able to reorganize and rebuild to form a juggernaut that marched all the way to Berlin. The war may have lasted into 1946, but the Soviets would still have captured Berlin and probably would have overrun the rest of Germany, too. When landings become inevitable, he diverts the landings to Italy, calling it soft underbelly of Axis. But it cannot be denied that the Americans sent us materiel Perhaps my original question should have been "What would have happened in WWII if there had been no Spam?". Does a neutral US still provide lend lease aid to both Britain and the USSR? After all the euphoria in London and Paris over the avoidance of war with Germany in 1938 with the Munich Agreement, which enshrined the Wilsonian principle of self-determination to allow the 3.5 million Germans in the Sudetenland to unite with Germany, Chamberlain viewed Hitlers violation of the pact as a personal insult and breach of honor. Nikita Khrushchev offered the same opinion. The German Army was practically at the gates of Moscow in late 1941. Though after landing and adapting to Western Front warfare after a while US forces were the backbone of the effort in Western Front, by the time they started making advance into Germany the war was more or less considered over by many on both sides. Yes Lend-Lease was vital, In order to ensure that tank production goals were met by Soviet industry, Stalin made Vyacheslav Malyshev, an engineer who had proven himself in the expansion of Soviet heavy industry in the 1930s, head of the Peoples Commissariat of the Tank Industry of the USSR (NKTP) that was established on 11 September. Sorry Soviet and British Nationalists: the USA economic, industrial and operational/tactical contributions were key: You know, that's the crux of the problem in all these discussions: practically. But when World War II has considered it is really Germany and Japan against most of the world. Thats assuming they were able to make advances. This series of articles represents an attempt to summarize the top mistakes and omissions that Germany made during the most terrible of all wars in human history. WebWithout the Russian Front, Germany would have turned the beaches of Europe into an impenetrable fortress. Germany's defeat came about from a number of much larger factors. Then there is the fact that Germany lacked the winter clothing for its Army during that first terrible Soviet winter. During 1942, the Red Army lost over 15,000 tanks, including 1,200 KV-1, 6,600 T-34s and 7,200 T-60/70s.100 About half of the 10,500 Lend-Lease tanks (3,000 British, 7,500 USA) delivered in 1942 were also lost.101 Soviet industry built 24,231 tanks in 1942, including 12,535 T-34s and 2,426 KV-1s. Our tank production was lower than Germany's and the quality was appalling. Such machines were of higher quality than analogues produced in the Soviet Union, which made a significant contribution to boosting Soviet industrial production. American air superiority WebWithout US forces supporting invasions of Normandy, Morocco, and Italy, the British Empire would have to recruit the missing American soldiers, but with American lend After the war, it was transferred to civilian aviation, carrying passengers over the frozen tundra above the Arctic Circle. His intended purpose of this second conference would have been to redress Germanys remaining legitimate grievances stemming from the unjust Treaty of Versailles and thereby secure a more just and lasting peace to avert the potential outbreak of World War II. WebThe war may have lasted into 1946, but the Soviets would still have captured Berlin and probably would have overrun the rest of Germany, too. This prompted Germany to declare war on the United States, which, in turn, led to the United States to declare war on Germany on December 11, 1941. The Soviets fought with American fighters, American tanks, 400,000 WebOf course, the easiest way Germany could have won World War II was by avoiding a fight with Britain, France, and the United States of America. What would NOT have happened would have been an invasion of the UK. But such aircraft were unable to defeat Great Britain. Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, fifteen years older than FDR and highly respected by him as an open-minded, patriotic Republican, had had Hopkins to lunch in his office at the Pentagon the day before he left for Tehran expressly to explore how they could stiffen the presidents resolve. The war might have ended in 1915 or 1916 with a negotiated peace Could World War II be won without United States? - Ozgur Zeren World War II in Europe was Germany and Italy, which was joined by Finland, Hungary, Romania, and to some extent Bulgaria. WebAnd without U.S. supplies, the Soviet war effort would have been massively diminished. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Theres rather broad agreement among mainstream historians on this. When we look at the situation in Western Front, we see Germans not sweating much to stall Allies after Normandy. But we have much to learn from that achievement as we face our troubles today. This was the final blow to Japanese war effort and broke the camels back, by the way. In addition, the Lend-Lease program propped up the Soviet railway system, which played a fundamental role in moving and supplying troops. In all, the United States shipped $50 billion ($608 billion in 2020 money) worth of materiel under the program, including $11.3 billion to the Soviet Union. This would have slowed the growth of US armed forces once the entered the war in december 41 and probebly delayed overlord untill 1945. Even if Japan wisely realized this (and it seems they did, in Khalkin Gol) and refrained from pushing towards USSR, Soviets would still keep divisions across the border even if themselves did not advance that would force Japan to keep defenses and divisions here, reducing their war effort elsewhere. By June 1944, Soviets were already positioning for their drive into Germany, as can be seen from the state of Eastern Front at that date: Just a month after Normandy, Red Army was already pushing into Germany. metal splinters inside the tank) when the tank was hit by non-penetrating rounds.137 Although designed as infantry support tanks and employed in that role by the Red Army, the 2-pounder gun did not have an HE round, which reduced the value of the tanks in that role. Churchill is particularly a factor in this. The notion that Britain could have survived long term with the US's aid is total rubbish. Having to only fight a one-front war against the Soviet Union might have enabled the Poles to hold out for a few months instead of a few weeks against the Soviet onslaught perhaps resulting in a few hundred thousand more Red Army casualties. A monument in Fairbanks, Alaska, to the American pilots who flew almost 8,000 U.S. planes to Alaska and to the Soviet pilots who flew them on to Siberia as part of Lend-Lease. But American and Soviet pilots pose in front of a Bell P-39 Airacobra, supplied to the Soviet Union under the Lend-Lease program. This naturally means that though lack of such supplies like radios and vehicles like trucks would be detrimental, they would not have been critical. Most visibly, the United States provided the Soviet Union with more than 400,000 jeeps and trucks, 14,000 aircraft, 8,000 tractors and construction vehicles, and 13,000 battle tanks. WebWould Russia have won ww2 without the US? If Germany developed the right aircraft the war could have turned out differently, but another factor was its industry. Again I asked myself the question would the Allied powers had won without US involvement. Britain, regardless of their stubborn perseverance, was undermanned and under supplied compared to Germany, as evidenced by quick reversal of the early victories they won in North Africa against Italy, after Rommel landed. Lend-Lease also sent aviation fuel equivalent to 57 percent of what the Soviet Union itself produced. On top of that, we dont see Japan being able to subdue even China before it entered World War II. Eventually, those nations got out of the fight and in the case of Romania joined with the Soviets against the Hungarians. On March 12, 1943, the plane was given to the Soviet Air Force in Fairbanks, Alaska, and given the registration USSR-N238. The thing that is certain that war would last even longer in that case, and cost many more lives. Allies Won World War II These freed up Soviet resources to concentrate on combat vehicle production. During World War II the Soviet Union received large amounts of aid from the Western world in the form of supplies and military intervention, both of which were declared to have been irrelevant for the Soviet Unions victory over Nazi Germany by Soviet historians. Lend-Lease to the Soviets was critical even in 1941: You really need to broaden your sources, Lend-Lease had nil effect on the outcome of Barbarossa, and again you are trying to narrow the scope of the discussion. A map of lend-lease shipments from the United States to the U.S.S.R. from 1941-45. The Lend-Lease program also sent tons of factory equipment and machine tools to the Soviet Union, including more than 38,000 lathes and other metal-working tools. If Zhukov was able to destroy a veteran Japanese army in ~4 months in Khalkin Gol, they could easily hold them off with less divisions and resources. As history tells us, Operation Overlord was a success as Allied forces managed to breach Hitlers Without landing craft another example of wrong equipment and lacking control of the skies of Great Britain, an invasion by Germany was simply impossible. Red Army tank officers were not impressed with the 2-pounder (40mm) gun on the Matilda and Valentines, nor their poor cross-country mobility, but their 6075mm-thick armour was impervious to German 3.7cm and 5cm anti-tank weapons. In addition, almost half of all the rails used by the Soviet Union during the war came through Lend-Lease. Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers and websites. WebIt must be baldly stated: Germany would have won World War I had the U.S. Army not intervened in France in 1918.The French and British were barely hanging on in 1918. That neatly sums it up. Whether Stalin would have still invaded and annexed the Baltic States, eastern Finland, eastern Poland and northeastern Romania from 19391940 is unclear. SolomonOf47704 22 days ago. The body of the captain, Maksim Tyurikov, was found by local hunters about 120 kilometers from the wreck in 1953. Japan is a special case which maybe we shouldnt even consider in regard to war production. "During World War II, only the supplies brought in by Lend-Lease prevented the paralysis of rail transport in the Soviet Union.". Responding to President Franklin D. US lost five major wars after 1945 However, the US was unable to get any significant victory in its wars abroad. America fought five major wars after 1945 including Korea, Vietnam, Gulf War, Iraq, and Afghanistan in addition to some minor wars in Somalia, Yemen, and Libya. The exhausted Allies would have had to negotiate some kind of settlement with Central Power forces occupying almost all of what is now Ukraine, Poland, and the Baltic republics in the east; most of Romania and Yugoslavia in Southern Europe, as well as a bit of Italy; and almost all of Belgium and most of northeast, 5 Reasons the United States Entered World War One. Asked by: Quincy Bins. They did not have the important critical resources, minerals needed for war production, hampering their already technologically backward equipment.